Home › Battles › Vikings vs Aztec Warriors
⛵
Vikings
VS
🌋
Aztecs

Vikings vs Aztec Warriors

Community vote: Vikings 61% · 👁 21K views

Vikings and Aztecs never met, but they came closer than most people realise. Around the year 1000, Norse explorers reached North America. Five centuries later, the Aztec Empire dominated central Mexico. What if a Viking war band had sailed south and landed on the Aztec coast? Here is how Norse iron would fare against obsidian and a warrior empire.

The Vikings: Who They Were

The Viking Age is usually dated from the raid on the monastery of Lindisfarne in 793 to the Battle of Stamford Bridge in 1066. Norse warriors from Denmark, Norway and Sweden raided, traded and settled from Ireland to the Caspian Sea. They conquered much of England, founded Normandy, served as the elite Varangian Guard in Constantinople, and settled Iceland and Greenland.

Viking forces were usually small by later standards. A raiding party might be a few ships with 30 to 60 men each, while the "Great Heathen Army" that invaded England in 865 probably numbered a few thousand. Their great advantage was the longship: fast, shallow enough to row up rivers, and able to land almost anywhere.

The Aztecs: Who They Were

The Aztec (Mexica) Empire grew from the island city of Tenochtitlan, founded in the 14th century on Lake Texcoco. From 1428 the Triple Alliance of Tenochtitlan, Texcoco and Tlacopan expanded rapidly, until the empire collected tribute from millions of people. Tenochtitlan may have held 200,000 people, making it one of the largest cities in the world.

War was central to Aztec society. Every young man received military training, and a warrior's status depended on the number of captives he took in battle. The best joined the elite eagle and jaguar warrior societies. The Aztec state could raise armies numbering in the tens of thousands.

Weapons and Armour

Obsidian is sharper than any steel edge, but it is brittle. It cuts flesh and cloth terribly well, but it chips and shatters against iron helmets, mail and metal shield bosses. That is the single biggest factor in this matchup.

Tactics and Leadership

Vikings fought on foot, usually forming a shield wall, a tight line of overlapping shields with spears and axes striking over and between them. Their strength was aggression, surprise and the ability to retreat to their ships.

Aztec armies opened with showers of darts, arrows and sling stones, then closed in waves of warriors. Much of their fighting aimed to capture enemies alive for sacrifice, rather than kill them. That custom cost them dearly later against the Spanish. Aztec commanders were skilled at moving large armies with a supply system of porters and tributary cities.

What Really Happened When Vikings Met Native Americans

We do have one real reference point. Around 1000 AD, Norse Greenlanders led by Leif Erikson reached a land they called Vinland. A Norse site at L'Anse aux Meadows in Newfoundland confirms they were there. According to the Icelandic sagas, clashes with the local people, whom the Norse called Skrælings, were a major reason the settlers gave up and left. The Norse had iron, but they were few, far from home and badly outnumbered.

How the Battle Would Play Out

Imagine five longships with around 250 Vikings landing on the Gulf Coast in the late 1400s.

In their first clashes with local forces, the Vikings would do very well. Mail and helmets would turn aside many obsidian blows, the shield wall would stop Aztec charges, and iron axes would cut through cotton armour and wooden shields. The Aztec focus on taking captives would make it even harder to bring down armoured men.

But the Aztecs would learn quickly and keep coming. They would shower the Vikings with atlatl darts and sling stones, strip the unarmoured men and wait. An empire that could call up 20,000 warriors, supply them from local cities, and fight in heat and terrain the Norse had never seen would grind a few hundred men down. Unlike the Spanish in 1519, the Vikings would have no guns, no horses and, crucially, no smallpox epidemic running ahead of them. They also would not have tens of thousands of local allies like the Tlaxcalans, who were the real backbone of the Spanish conquest.

Verdict: Who Wins?

Man for man, the Vikings win. Iron and mail against obsidian and cotton is a real technological edge, and the community agrees, with the Vikings ahead in the vote. In an equal-numbers battle, the shield wall should hold and break the Aztec line.

A Viking invasion, though, would fail. The Aztec Empire's size, organisation and home advantage would eventually overwhelm any force that could cross the Atlantic in longships, just as the Skrælings pushed the Norse out of Vinland. Do you back iron or numbers? Vote on the homepage.

Sources and Further Reading

— Advertisement —

More Battles